The Modern Revolution of Real Estate Appraisal

July 13th, 2011 8:38 AM

Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on July 13th, 2011 8:38 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
May 11th, 2011 7:18 PM

Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on May 11th, 2011 7:18 PMPost a Comment (1)

Subscribe to this blog
May 11th, 2011 7:15 PM

Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on May 11th, 2011 7:15 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
January 14th, 2011 3:52 PM

Appraisers will see a major change to the URAR this year, effective September 1, 2011, when all appraisals submitted to Fannie and Freddie are required to use the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD). This data set will standardize key verbiage in the URAR and change the way we write appraisals. The argument will be raised (again) that this is another way to force appraisers out of business by taking their data and using it against them to create more accurate automated valuation models. It is likely that the data will be “mined” and used for other purposes, but the purpose of this article is not to debate pros and cons, but rather educate everyone on the changes that are ahead this year.

What is the MISMO?

Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization is a corporation that develops electronic commerce standards for the mortgage industry. They have based their platform on Extensible Markup Language (XML). The purpose of XML is to communicate data to any computer from any other computer through standardization. The UAD will be the “standardized” language used for XML.

What is UAD?

The Uniform Appraisal Dataset is the backbone of the XML programming scheme. In order for data to be collected in a usable format many of the fields in the appraisal form will be transformed into restricted fields where the data must be entered in a specific manner, or selected from a drop down list. For example:

An appraiser may enter the tax year as ’10, but the new UAD will require the full year 2010 (yyyy)

Full dates will be in the mm/dd/yyyy format (such as the indicated contract date)

The data must be entered in the specific format or an error message will prompt the appraiser to change the information, similar to some online forms.

The data set requirements released for the most common appraisal forms on December 16, 2010 contains 241 pages. The document can be found at this link, but it is written for computer programmers and it may be difficult to understand. We have highlighted many of the notable changes below:

Listing history section

This section will require specific information when the, “yes the subject was offered for sale”, box is checked. DOM, original listings price, original listing date, and data sources used will be mandatory. Because this data is mandatory software vendors will likely break these fields into separate side "form" where you will fill out the information and then the software will alter the data to put it in the exact format required by MISMO (DOM150;Subject property was offered for sale on 03/01/2010 for $200,000. The data source is MRIS#12345AB.)

Sale contract

The appraiser will be required to note what type of sale the subject is from a “drop down” selection limited to only the following choices: REO sale, Short sale, Court ordered sale, Estate sale, Relocation sale, Non-arm’s length sale, or Arm’s length sale. This section will be mandatory for all purchases.

Site section

If the site size is less than one acre it must be reported in square feet, and if it is greater, it will be reported in acres. The XML language even requires abbreviations in specific formats for square feet (sf) and acres (ac). Some software provides will likely only allow numeric values to be entered, which the computer will then automatically provide the required abbreviation.

View

The view section is one of the largest changes in the new UAD. Describing the view will have two dropdowns. The first will be a rating of the view as Neutral, Beneficial, or Adverse (abbreviated “N”, “B”, or “A”). The second drop down will be the actual view, which will have an open fill in section and will allow multiple selections if applicable. Each view has its own abbreviation that will carry forward to the sales grid. The following views will be available in the drop down: Water View, Pastoral View, Woods View, Park View, Golf Course View, City View or Skyline View, Mountain View, Residential View, City Street View, Industrial View, Power Lines, Limited Sight, and Other (user defined; may not contain “none”, “n/a”, “typical”, or “average”).

Improvement Section

Appraisers that use ambiguous terminology in the improvement section will have a lot to change, but some very basic changes will affect all appraisers. The number of levels section will only allow numbers (“1 level” will not be permitted, only “1”). The design will be an appropriate description and the use of “average” or “typical” will be rejected. If there is no fireplace or woodstove, a “0” will be required in the space. A home with two full bathrooms and one-half bathroom will be denoted as “2.1”, or two-half bathrooms as “2.2”.

Condition

There are major changes in the condition related fields and new specific information that will be required. There will be a drop down for condition allowing only the following ratings: New (C1), Excellent (C2), Good (C3), Average (C4), Fair (C5), or Poor (C6). These definitions are specifically defined on page 33 of this link. Additionally, the appraiser must indicate ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ if there was any work done to the kitchen or bathrooms in the prior 15 years, and upon a yes response additional information is required. The following indications will be required: Level of work completed (not updated, updated or remodeled), time frame (less than one year ago, one to five years ago, six to ten years ago, eleven to fifteen years ago, timeframe unknown; timeframes should indicate when the majority of work was completed). Examples provided by FNMA and Freddie Mac include the following:

C4; No updates in the prior 15 years

C3; Kitchen- updated less than one year ago; Bathrooms-remodeled-one to five

years ago

C2; Kitchen- not updated; Bathrooms-remodeled-less than one year ago



Sales Comparison Approach

Financing will have a drop down containing the following fields: FHA, VA, Conventional, Seller, Cash, USDA – Rural housing, or Appraiser defined.

Date of sale will allow for the following abbreviations before the sale date: “c” for Contract Date, “s” for Settlement Date, “w” for Withdrawn Date, “e” for Expiration Date. The date must be entered in the format “mm/dd”, and If the contract date is known and the sale date is known they may both be entered per the following example: s01/11;c06/10

Location will utilize the same Neutral, Beneficial or Adverse rating as the view field, and it will require the selection of at least one but not more than two of the following “location factors”: Residential, Industrial, Commercial, Busy Road, Water Front, Golf Course, Adjacent to Park, Adjacent to Power Lines, Landfill, Public Transportation, or Appraiser Defined.

View for the comparable sales will follow the same format outlined above for the subject property.

Quality will have six selections, which will be later defined (Q1 through Q6). Each selection has been defined on page 34 of this link, but the exact terminology has not been determined.

Condition also follows the same format as the subject; however, no rating of the kitchen or bathrooms is required.

Basement will require several specific items including the type of basement (walk-out, walk-up, or interior only), the finish, and the room type or types (recreation room, bedroom, bathroom, or other).

Lender / Client

The name of the appraisal management company will appear in the appraisal report, or ‘No AMC’ will be required.

Conclusions

Many appraisers will find that most of the changes will have little effect on their day-to-day procedures, but some fields may result in extra clarification in the narrative of the report.

The view section contains some apparent positive and negative changes. The addition of a rating, neutral, beneficial or adverse, is welcomed; however, the limited term “Water View” may be abused by some foul appraisers. In Orlando, a pond water view with no recreational activity permitted is “beneficial” over having rear neighbors, but rarely comparable to the benefit of a water view of a lake where you can boat. The ambiguity of the term is dangerous, and comments that are more extensive will be necessary when comparing beneficial or adverse views that are not truly equal. The view field is often market driven, and some specific intricacies may prove challenging for the reader to completely comprehend.

The location field in the sales approach provides some redundancy to the view comment. There may also be some extra clarification needed when two beneficial residential locations are not equally adjusted. If an appraiser selects “adjacent to power lines” for the location and “power line” view, they may make a mistake in double counting the negative attribute.

Appraisers have become used to specific lender requirements for terminology and verbiage, but the UAD will bring all lenders to the same very specific page. There are many pros and cons to the new system, which will exhaustively be discussed in the months leading up to its implementation, but for now consider these changes and plan ahead as an expert on the new technology.

This document is being written based on the “Initial Version” release on December 16, 2010 of the UAD. Information is deemed reliable, but data should be verified. ©2011 Nicholas D. Pilz




Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on January 14th, 2011 3:52 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
December 16th, 2010 10:09 AM

After 5 years of taking classes in between providing the highest quality service to our clients, Nicholas Pilz has obtained his SRA designation from the Appraisal Institute. The process involves rigorous education, narrative writing demonstration and critique, and peer review and critique. Designated members of the Appraisal Institute are bound by the highest level of professional ethics, and are the highest educated appraisers in the industry. The Appraisal Institute sets the highest standards for professional designation and they are the largest professional organization of appraiser’s in the United States, including 23,000 associate, affiliate, or designated members. For more information about the professional designations offered by the Appraisal Institute, please click on the link below:

 

Nicholas D. Pilz, SRA   SRA

State Certified Residential Appraiser RD4628 

About the SRA designation


Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on December 16th, 2010 10:09 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
January 16th, 2009 5:02 PM

The Modern Revolution of Real Estate Appraisal

The HVCC

The Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) is a code of conduct that is intended to provide consumer protection from fraudulent or cohered appraisal values by separating the loan production staff from the appraisal ordering function. The code is required on all mortgages being sold to either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (government sponsored entities or GSE’s). It is safe to assume however that the code will be adopted as general practice for all loans as many underwriting guidelines established by Fannie and Freddie in the past have become standard procedure. The code is scheduled to be implemented on May 1, 2009; however, legal delays are still eminent.

Background:

The code stems from a lawsuit that is currently pending between the New York Attorney General and eAppraiseIT (an Appraisal Management Company or AMC) and their largest client at the time Washington Mutual. The complaint alleges that the loan production staff at WAMU hand-picked appraisers who were able to bring-in the appraisal value to make loans. The attorney general found enough evidence to determine that industry participants pressure appraisers to value homes at predetermined and possibly inflated values in many more instances than with just the WAMU case. This pressure came in the form of threatening to withhold future business, by threatening to take an appraiser off an approved list and by withholding payment. An agreement was made with the GSE’s and OFEHO to implement the HVCC and after one comment period the code has been finalized.

Negative Implications of the HVCC:

The HVCC will essentially drive all appraisal business to AMC type companies. These companies will generally charge a higher fee for the appraisal than if it were contracted directly with an appraisal firm and will only pay the appraiser a fee split ranging from 25% to 90%. If the fee is $350 for an appraisal the appraiser may actually only be paid $175 while the AMC collects the rest of the fee for placing the order, maintaining the client relationship and often doing a QC check of the appraisal report of which requires only a fraction of the cost incurred by a typical appraisal office to produce an appraisal.

While the cost of living is going up around the country appraisal fees are being driven down by supply and demand and by AMC’s that offer to pay the smallest fee splits by having the largest pools of business. The AMC’s that will thrive are the ones that can pay the appraiser’s the least and in turn use their profits to generate more business, buy-out competition and take a stronger stand in the market place. Without regulation of AMC’s the free market may result in larger management companies and smaller appraisal fees due to supply and demand forces. The most highly trained appraiser’s often refuse to work for fees that barely cover overhead. These appraisers often spend twice as much time on reports to assure that all of the necessary data, analysis and conclusions are made in a report rather than a set of canned comments.

Furthermore, the HVCC will effectively dismantle client relationships that have been forged over the years. These client relationships have often come at a price and provide value to a company (take your client rolodex and cut it in half, is your company still as valuable as it was?). Old clients will turn to AMC’s and when appraiser’s attempt to sign up for an AMC they will likely hear, “sorry our list is full”.

Positive Implications of the HVCC:

The HVCC will help return the word “art” to the definition of appraisal more prominently and restore some lost consumer confidence along the way. Appraisers will no longer have estimates of value in the appraisal request and will not have anyone calling with threats.

What you need to know:

Compliance with the code is not required for non-GSE mortgages including FHA or Jumbo assignments. We recommend that you hire an appraiser that best knows the market and can thoroughly analyze data relevant to that market.

For non-GSE assignments or other assignment types get to know your appraiser. Find out what tools the appraiser uses to research market trends. Ask questions like what type of networking do you participate in to learn the latest market trends, have you appraised properties in this geographical area, or have you appraised this property type before.

Bottom line is to hire experience.

Other Solutions:

A hotline is a great concept to report misconduct and could be the primary emphasis rather than a mandate for AMC use.

A Uniform Residential Appraisal Request Form (for residential assignments only) that is required to be included in each appraisal.

It will become our company policy to include a copy of the engagement letter with all appraisal reports after the implementation of the code. This process will provide evidence that the engagement letter does not contain any violations of the code of conduct.

Other Resources:

HVCC Revised (showing all of the old and new comments)

Fannie Mae FAQ

Freddie Mac FAQ

Harney HVCC Washington Post Article

About Us

Nicholas D. Pilz is the owner and senior appraiser of Appraisal & Consultant Services, Inc. He has 8 years of experience in residential appraisal primarily in the Orlando Metro area including Orange, Lake, Seminole, Osceola, Polk, Brevard and Volusia counties. Prior to appraising Nicholas worked in real estate sales and as a foreman building houses. Nicholas currently serves as the chair of the Government Relations Committee for the East Florida Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and as the vice-chair of the HVCC committee. Appraisal & Consultant Services, Inc. utilizes unique tools in the field and behind the desk to provide our clients with optimal data for making decisions in difficult markets. Please feel free to contact us at acsinc@acsappraisers.com or at 407-737-1008 for more information.


Posted by Nicholas D Pilz, SRA on January 16th, 2009 5:02 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Appraisal & Consultant Services, Inc. 14338 New Blossom Lane Winter Garden, FL 34787
Phone: Fax:

Contact Us | Appraiser Links | Myths | Estate | Expert Witness | News | About PMI | Home | Site Map | About AVM's | PMI Video | Sell Your Home | SRA designation | Relocation Appraisal | Blog

Copyright © 2012 Appraisal & Consultant Services, Inc.
Portions Copyright © 2012 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map



 
State:
County:
City:
Zip: